OmniPlan Alternative for Mac, iPad, and iPhone

Quick Look:

• OmniPlan is a powerful Apple-native project management app for complex scheduling, resource leveling, collaboration, dashboards, Monte Carlo simulation, earned value analysis, and Microsoft Project support.
• QuickPlanX is the best OmniPlan alternative for most Apple users who personally build and maintain project schedules: focused, fast, beautiful, affordable, and designed around the work planners do every day.
• Pricing checked April 30, 2026: OmniPlan starts at $199.99 for Standard, $399.99 for Pro, or $199.99/year for the Pro subscription according to The Omni Group; QuickPlanX is $15.99/year or $3.99/month according to the App Store. On annual subscription pricing, OmniPlan Pro is about 12.5x the price of QuickPlanX.
• Legacy QuickPlan App Store ratings are a strong usability proof point: QuickPlan's Mac, iPad, and iPhone listings show ratings around 4.6-4.7 stars across far larger review volumes, while visible OmniPlan 4 listings show lower ratings with far fewer ratings.
• Both products run across Apple devices, but their center of gravity is different: OmniPlan is built for deep project management control; QuickPlanX is built for everyday planning speed, direct schedule maintenance, polished output, and a more enjoyable Apple-native workflow.
• OmniPlan remains a serious option for advanced resource, cost, collaboration, or risk-analysis workflows. QuickPlanX is the stronger recommendation when you want the best daily Gantt planning experience on Mac, iPad, and iPhone.

OmniPlan deserves respect. It is one of the strongest Apple-native project management tools available, and it has earned that reputation for good reasons. It supports Gantt charts, network diagrams, resource leveling, critical path, multiple baselines, collaboration, Monte Carlo simulation, earned value analysis, and Microsoft Project import/export in its Pro edition.

The more useful question is practical:

Do you need the full depth of OmniPlan, or do you need a faster, simpler way to build and maintain project schedules on Apple devices?

That distinction matters. Many people searching for an OmniPlan alternative are not trying to downgrade. They want a better daily planning workflow: fewer setup decisions, less interface density, lower cost, and a schedule that stays easy to update while the work is changing.

QuickPlanX is built for that exact moment: when you want professional scheduling power, but you do not want the planning tool itself to become a second project.

For that audience, QuickPlanX is not merely a cheaper alternative. It is the better product choice: faster to work in, easier to keep current, more pleasant to look at, more practical to share from, and far less expensive to own.

OmniPlan Is Built for Deep Project Control

OmniPlan's own positioning is about managing complexity. Its official feature list includes automatic schedule creation, resource leveling, critical path, multiple baselines, cost tracking, collaboration, multi-project dashboards, Monte Carlo simulation, earned value analysis, resource load sharing, reporting, automation, and Microsoft Project support.

That is a serious feature set. It makes OmniPlan a good fit for users who need:

• advanced resource allocation and leveling
• cost forecasting and budget-oriented project tracking
• multiple baselines and earned value analysis
• Monte Carlo simulation for milestone confidence
• dashboards across multiple projects
• collaboration with change tracking
• direct .mpp and .xml Microsoft Project import/export in Pro
• automation through Omni Automation or AppleScript on Mac

If those features are central to your work, OmniPlan is a credible option. A construction planner, program manager, operations lead, or project controller who needs formal resource balancing and advanced project analysis has good reasons to choose that depth.

But not every Apple user works that way.

Many people need a real schedule - tasks, hierarchy, dates, duration, dependencies, milestones, progress, critical path, resources, and reports - without adopting the workflow of a full project control system. They need to plan personally, update quickly, and keep the schedule alive during normal work.

That is where QuickPlanX is different.

The Main Difference: Project Control vs. Planning Flow

OmniPlan is designed around deep project control: resource leveling, simulations, formal tracking, collaboration workflow, and portfolio-level visibility.

QuickPlanX creates the most value when the planner needs momentum: getting ideas into the schedule quickly, reshaping tasks, editing many fields, linking work, updating progress, and moving between Mac, iPad, and iPhone without turning schedule maintenance into a separate administrative exercise.

This is not only a feature difference. It is a product philosophy difference.

OmniPlan gives you a powerful project management environment. QuickPlanX gives you a high-speed planning workspace with a more modern Apple-app feel.

In QuickPlanX, the core experience is built around four coordinated views:

• Table View for spreadsheet-style editing of structured task data
• Gantt Chart for schedule timing, dependencies, progress, and critical path
• Tree View for building and reorganizing the work breakdown structure
• Column View for browsing hierarchy in a Finder-like way

All four views show the same live project. The point is not to make the app look busy. The point is to let you approach the plan from the angle that matches the decision you are making.

For example:

• If you are creating a structure, Tree or Column View is natural.
• If you are reviewing timing, Gantt Chart is natural.
• If you are editing dates, resources, progress, or custom fields across many tasks, Table View is natural.
• If you are refining one task while keeping the larger project in view, the Inspector is natural.

That is the core QuickPlanX advantage: the app adapts to the way you are thinking about the plan. You spend less time translating your intention into the tool's preferred workflow, and more time improving the schedule itself. This is where the product earns its "best alternative" position: not by copying every enterprise feature, but by making the work users touch most often feel dramatically better.

See Easy Project Planning for Mac, iPad, and iPhone for a deeper look at the QuickPlanX planning model.

Price: Premium Project System vs. Affordable Daily Planning Tool

OmniPlan is priced like premium professional software.

As of April 2026, Omni Group lists OmniPlan 4 pricing as:

	OmniPlan Standard	OmniPlan Pro	QuickPlanX
Perpetual license	$199.99	$399.99	N/A
Annual subscription	N/A	$199.99/year	$15.99/year
Monthly option	N/A	N/A	$3.99/month
Apple devices included	Mac, iPhone, iPad, Apple Vision Pro	Mac, iPhone, iPad, Apple Vision Pro	Mac, iPad, iPhone

That makes OmniPlan's annual subscription about 12.5x the annual QuickPlanX subscription.

The price difference reflects different markets. OmniPlan Pro includes advanced project-control features such as earned value analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, multi-project dashboards, collaboration, resource load sharing, and direct Microsoft Project .mpp support. If those capabilities save time or reduce risk in your project environment, the higher price can be justified.

But if your actual need is to create and maintain Gantt schedules on your own Apple devices, the economics look different. Paying for high-end project controls can feel excessive when most of your daily work is:

• building a task structure
• setting dates and durations
• linking tasks
• tracking progress
• adjusting the schedule after changes
• sharing a PDF, image, CSV, chart, milestone report, or task text summary
• keeping the plan available on Mac, iPad, and iPhone

For that kind of planning, QuickPlanX is intentionally priced and designed as a personal productivity tool.

This is where the comparison becomes less about "Which app has more features?" and more about "Which app gives me the better daily planning experience for the work I actually do?"

If two tools were close in price, the safer decision might be to choose the deeper project-control system just in case you someday need its advanced controls. But when one option costs less than one-tenth as much annually, the question changes. QuickPlanX does not need to duplicate every advanced feature to be the better daily planning choice. It needs to cover real scheduling work confidently, stay pleasant to use, and avoid making the user pay for complexity that sits unused.

That is the QuickPlanX argument: a serious planning app whose design is focused on the way many Apple users actually maintain schedules. If the design feels faster, the ratings show stronger user satisfaction, and the price is dramatically lower, the burden of proof shifts. The premium tool should be chosen because its advanced capabilities are truly needed, not simply because it has the longer checklist.

In practical terms, the feature gap is much narrower than the price gap for many users. QuickPlanX covers the common everyday scheduling layer: hierarchy, Gantt chart, dependencies, dates, durations, progress, critical path, resources, reports, import/export, and cross-device continuity. Its extra design investment is in making those scheduling actions faster and easier to maintain. OmniPlan's advantage is mainly in advanced analysis, deeper reporting and resource controls, formal collaboration, portfolio-style dashboards, team-oriented project control, and direct .mpp exchange. Those are valuable capabilities when you need them, but they are a different emphasis from day-to-day schedule creation and maintenance.

Planning need	OmniPlan	QuickPlanX
Gantt chart scheduling	Yes	Yes
Task hierarchy and summary tasks	Yes	Yes
Dependencies, milestones, progress, and critical path	Yes	Yes
Resources, costs, custom fields, and reports	Deeper project-control model	Practical scheduling model
Microsoft Project exchange	.mpp and .xml in Pro	Microsoft Project XML
Advanced analysis	Monte Carlo simulation, earned value analysis, dashboards	Focused on schedule creation and maintenance
Fast structure editing	Outline and project-control views	Table, Gantt, Tree, and Column views optimized for daily maintenance
Output and presentation	Professional reports	Strong PDF, image, CSV, chart, resource, milestone, and text outputs
Workspace customization	Project-control oriented	Project-level fields, views, display, toolbar, appearance, and text templates
Annual subscription price	$199.99/year	$15.99/year

More accurately, the difference is not only "more features versus fewer features." It is also a difference in product emphasis. Some project planning apps offer views such as network diagrams or calendar-style views that QuickPlanX does not provide. QuickPlanX instead invests in views that support fast structure creation and schedule maintenance, especially Tree View and Column View. For many planners, those views are more useful during the messy middle of planning: when the work breakdown is still changing, phases need to be reorganized, and the schedule is becoming clearer through iteration.

This is also why "easy to use" can mean very different things. OmniPlan is designed to make a sophisticated project management system approachable, and for its level of capability that is a real achievement. QuickPlanX starts from a more aggressive usability goal: reduce the effort required to read the project, understand its structure, change that structure, and keep the schedule current. Tree View and Column View are central to that goal. They are not decorative alternatives to a Gantt chart; they are planning surfaces that make a complex project easier to scan, navigate, reorganize, and maintain.

Pricing as of April 2026. OmniPlan pricing source: The Omni Group OmniPlan pricing. QuickPlanX pricing source: App Store. Prices may vary by region and can change over time.

App Store Ratings: A Signal About Everyday Usability

Feature lists are useful, but they do not always predict how an app feels after months of real use. App Store ratings are not perfect either - they vary by country, platform, review volume, and product generation - but they are still a meaningful signal about user satisfaction.

Because QuickPlanX was recently released, its own long-term rating history is still forming. However, the legacy QuickPlan apps, which QuickPlanX is built to succeed, show a clear pattern in App Store rating data:

App Store listing	Rating shown	Visual rating	Review volume shown
QuickPlan for Mac (worldwide)	4.6 / 5	★★★★★★★★★★	2,544 ratings
QuickPlan for Mac (US)	4.7 / 5	★★★★★★★★★★	649 ratings
QuickPlan for iPad	4.7 / 5	★★★★★★★★★★	917 ratings
QuickPlan for iPhone	4.7 / 5	★★★★★★★★★★	398 ratings
OmniPlan 4	3.9 / 5	★★★★★★★★★★	20 ratings

These App Store rating figures were checked and recorded on April 30, 2026.

The Mac-specific App Store view for OmniPlan 4 has also shown an even lower 3.0 rating with 21 ratings. Because App Store pages can vary by platform view and region, the exact numbers should be checked before purchase. The directional point is still important: the older QuickPlan products have accumulated substantially stronger App Store satisfaction across larger review volumes.

That matters for this comparison because the ratings reflect the same product philosophy QuickPlanX continues: planning should feel approachable, fast, and practical. Users do not only judge project planning software by how many advanced controls it contains. They judge whether they can build a plan, update it under pressure, recover from schedule changes, and keep working without feeling buried in the tool.

That does not settle every buyer's decision. Power users may still prefer OmniPlan for its advanced controls. But for people evaluating daily usability, the rating contrast is hard to ignore: QuickPlan's predecessor apps earned strong satisfaction by making planning approachable, fast, and easy to maintain.

For someone searching for an OmniPlan alternative, this is one of the strongest reasons to consider QuickPlanX. The goal is not to out-feature OmniPlan Pro. The goal is to deliver the planning experience that many Apple users actually enjoy using.

What Users Say About the QuickPlan Design

The App Store ratings above are numeric signals. The reviews behind them explain the same pattern in human language: QuickPlan users often praise the app for being easier to learn, faster to operate, and more direct than traditional planning tools.

Because QuickPlanX is recently released, its own review volume is still growing. However, short excerpts from the legacy QuickPlan App Store reviews show this consistent user experience:

"QuickPlan is a breeze - a shallow learning curve, obvious structures and features."

• Sk3tchbook, App Store ★★★★★

"Simplicity, cleanliness in the UI but with power underneath."

• App Store ★★★★★

"The features are just enough to get real management done."

• App Store ★★★★★

"Most of the time you really just need the Work Breakdown Structure, milestones, and Gantt chart."

• Codenix, App Store ★★★★★

One review even compared QuickPlan directly with OmniPlan on iPad and still preferred QuickPlan for the balance of simplicity and practical power. That is exactly the position QuickPlanX continues: not every project planner wants the heaviest possible system. Many want the schedule to be clear, editable, and always close at hand.

Scheduling: What QuickPlanX Covers

QuickPlanX is not a simple timeline drawer. It is the best choice when you want a professional schedule that remains easy to create, easy to revise, and easy to share. It includes the capabilities needed for everyday schedule creation, maintenance, and communication:

• Gantt chart with task bars, progress, dependency lines, milestones, and critical path
• task hierarchy and summary tasks for work breakdown structure
• task dependencies including common link types
• dates, durations, progress, resources, costs, and custom fields
• baseline and progress tracking
• Table, Gantt, Tree, and Column views
• PDF, image, CSV, chart, resource, milestone, and text reports
• Microsoft Project XML import and export
• spreadsheet copy/paste workflows
• OPML and mind map import
• iCloud CloudKit sync across Mac, iPad, and iPhone

This covers the core work of planning, maintaining, and communicating a schedule.

That point is important: QuickPlanX concentrates its strength in the areas users touch constantly during normal scheduling work. The differences are mainly in advanced statistics and analysis, deeper report customization, team/portfolio management, direct .mpp exchange, and some specialized project-control details - not in the basic ability to create and manage a professional schedule.

The boundary is intentional. QuickPlanX is built first for schedule creation, schedule maintenance, personal productivity, and practical reporting across Apple devices. It focuses on the part of project planning that many users do every day: getting the schedule right and keeping it current. For Microsoft Project exchange, QuickPlanX uses Microsoft Project XML.

Design, Output, and Customization

The strongest QuickPlanX advantage is not only speed. It is the combination of speed, visual design, output quality, and customization aimed at real planning work.

QuickPlanX is designed to feel like a modern Apple app: clean, direct, and visually calm. That matters in project planning because a schedule is not just data. It is something you read, adjust, present, and return to repeatedly. A beautiful planning surface reduces fatigue and makes the project easier to understand.

The output story is also unusually strong for a personal planning app. QuickPlanX can share plans as PDF, image, CSV, chart, resource, milestone, and text reports. It also supports customizable text templates, so a task list can become a status update, handoff note, client summary, or lightweight report without rebuilding the same message every time.

Customization is another place where QuickPlanX is easy to underestimate. Microsoft Project has very deep enterprise-style customization, but QuickPlanX is strong in a different and more practical direction: shaping the planning workspace around how you actually work. You can customize project fields, visible columns, Table View layout, Gantt taskbar content, Tree View nodes, Column View cards, Inspector fields, toolbar access, appearance settings, and text-report templates.

That kind of customization directly supports everyday productivity. It helps you build a workspace that shows the right information, produces the right output, and keeps the plan readable without forcing you into a heavyweight administration model.

For many Apple users, this is why QuickPlanX is the best alternative: it gives you professional scheduling power, polished output, and meaningful customization while keeping the app fast enough to use every day.

Focused Features Can Be Better Design

It is fair to say that OmniPlan has more total features than QuickPlanX. That is part of OmniPlan's value for users who need a comprehensive project management environment.

But more total features do not automatically create a better daily planning tool. In many project scheduling apps, part of the feature set exists for specialized situations: enterprise control, formal analysis, resource optimization, cross-project administration, or alternate visualizations such as network diagrams and calendar views.

QuickPlanX is designed around a different judgment: optimize the most useful part of project planning until it becomes faster, clearer, and easier to maintain.

That means the product puts disproportionate attention on high-frequency work:

• creating a work breakdown structure quickly
• turning text, spreadsheets, mind maps, or AI outlines into tasks
• editing many task fields without leaving the planning surface
• moving and reorganizing branches as the project becomes clearer
• linking tasks with direct visual operations
• keeping dates, duration, progress, resources, and reports close to the schedule
• switching between Table, Gantt, Tree, and Column views without duplicating data
• carrying the same plan across Mac, iPad, and iPhone

Some of these workflows are not just "fewer features." They are different design choices. QuickPlanX includes planning operations and views that many traditional Gantt tools do not emphasize, such as fast outline-to-task creation, spreadsheet-style paste workflows, Tree View structure editing, Column View hierarchy navigation, direct branch restructuring, practical AI-assisted input, and in-progress task visibility.

These choices come from a specific view of project management practice: a plan is valuable only if it stays current. The app should therefore reduce the cost of updating the plan, not merely provide a long list of commands.

This is the stronger version of the price argument. QuickPlanX is not offering one-tenth the price for one-tenth the planning capability. It offers a complete everyday scheduling toolkit, plus design work aimed at the part of project planning users actually touch again and again. For many Apple users, that is the more attractive tradeoff: keep the planning power they need, gain a faster working experience, and spend far less.

The Daily Maintenance Advantage

OmniPlan can be intuitive for a project management system with its level of depth. QuickPlanX is aiming at a different everyday-usability bar: the schedule should be easy to revise while your understanding of the project is still forming.

This matters because project plans rarely arrive fully organized. They start as notes, client requirements, meeting outcomes, spreadsheets, AI drafts, and half-formed task lists. A good planning app should help you turn that material into a workable schedule, then keep reshaping it as the project becomes clearer.

QuickPlanX is strong in three maintenance-heavy moments:

• When structure is still changing. Tree View and Column View give the work breakdown structure its own space, so phases and task branches can be reviewed, moved, and refined without treating the Gantt chart as the only way to understand the project.
• When the schedule needs quick edits. Table View, Gantt Chart, Inspector, keyboard shortcuts, and touch-friendly interactions keep common updates close to the plan itself: dates, durations, dependencies, resources, progress, and custom fields.
• When project input comes from outside the app. QuickPlanX is designed to work with text outlines, spreadsheets, mind maps, OPML, Microsoft Project XML, and AI-generated drafts, so planning can start from the material you already have instead of forcing everything through manual task entry.

This is the honest marketing point: many project schedules benefit from a tool that makes maintenance feel light. A plan that is easy to update is more likely to stay accurate, and an accurate plan is far more valuable than a sophisticated plan that nobody wants to touch.

Speed Matters When the Plan Keeps Changing

Project plans change constantly. That is why interaction speed matters more than it first appears.

If every update requires too much ceremony, the plan quietly falls behind reality. A date change stays in someone's head. A dependency is remembered but not recorded. A broad task should be split, but nobody wants to disturb the schedule. A phase should be reorganized, but the official plan waits until later.

QuickPlanX is designed to make those updates cheap enough to do immediately.

Examples:

• Paste an indented text outline and instantly create a task hierarchy.
• Copy rows from Excel, Numbers, or Google Sheets into the project Table View.
• Use Tree or Column View to reorganize branches directly.
• Drag and drop tasks to restructure the work breakdown.
• Use keyboard shortcuts on Mac for repeated schedule edits.
• Split, duplicate, repeat, and reuse task branches without rebuilding the plan.
• Keep frequent actions in reach through the configurable toolbar.

This is where QuickPlanX feels most different from more administrative project management systems. It keeps complexity out of the way so the plan remains editable while you are still thinking.

See Fast Project Planning: Build and Maintain Schedules at Speed for the detailed workflow.

Resource Management: Deep Control or Practical Assignment?

Resource management is one of the clearest reasons some users consider OmniPlan.

OmniPlan has advanced resource features, including resource leveling, resource load sharing, resource views, cost tracking, resource calendars, and advanced allocation options. If your project depends on carefully balancing staff, equipment, and cost across complex schedules, those controls are meaningful.

QuickPlanX supports resource assignment and project-level resource information in the context where many planners actually use it: inside the schedule. It keeps resource information close to tasks, timing, progress, and reports, so assignment work supports planning instead of taking over the planning workflow.

That distinction is important:

• Choose OmniPlan if resource optimization is a primary responsibility.
• Choose QuickPlanX if resources are part of the schedule, but your main job is to build, maintain, and communicate the plan efficiently.

That practical approach can be an advantage for many planners. If you mostly need to know who owns the task, what the timing is, and how the schedule changes, QuickPlanX gives you the resource context you need while preserving the speed of the plan.

Microsoft Project Compatibility: OmniPlan Pro Is Broader, QuickPlanX Is Practical

Both products can connect to Microsoft Project workflows, but not in the same way.

OmniPlan Pro supports importing and exporting Microsoft Project .mpp and .xml files. Omni's documentation notes support for Microsoft Project files created with versions 2003 through 2019, while also documenting import/export quirks where data models differ.

QuickPlanX supports Microsoft Project XML import and export. For many real-world file-exchange workflows, that is the practical bridge: a Microsoft Project user can save a project as XML, QuickPlanX can import it, and QuickPlanX can export XML back for Microsoft Project users.

The practical difference:

• If you need direct .mpp file exchange, OmniPlan Pro has the advantage.
• If XML exchange is enough, QuickPlanX keeps the workflow practical, fast, and far less expensive.

For details on QuickPlanX file exchange, see Microsoft Project XML Import and Export and the Microsoft Project integration tutorial.

Sync and Device Continuity

Both OmniPlan and QuickPlanX are available across Apple devices, so this is not the same platform problem as Microsoft Project.

The difference is the sync model and the intended workflow.

OmniPlan supports syncing projects through iCloud Drive, third-party storage, Git/WebDAV workflows, and Omni collaboration features depending on configuration and edition. That flexibility fits users who need document-based workflows or collaborative project sharing.

QuickPlanX uses Apple's CloudKit to keep project data available across Mac, iPad, and iPhone through the user's Apple account. The goal is seamless personal device continuity: start on Mac, review on iPad, check current work on iPhone, and avoid manual file handling.

This is a clean Apple-ecosystem workflow for planners who want their own project data to follow them without extra setup.

If you need formal collaboration, OmniPlan Pro has dedicated workflows for that. If you need the same personal project plan to follow you across Apple devices with minimal setup, QuickPlanX is designed for that - and that is the workflow many independent planners actually need.

See Keep Your Project Plan in Sync Across Mac, iPad, and iPhone for more detail.

When OmniPlan Still Makes Sense

OmniPlan is still a good choice if your work is centered on advanced project control:

• You need Monte Carlo simulation or earned value analysis.
• You manage complex resource allocation and need resource leveling as a core workflow.
• You need multi-project dashboards or resource load sharing.
• You need OmniPlan collaboration and change tracking.
• You need direct .mpp import/export rather than Microsoft Project XML exchange.
• You want a more complete project-control environment and are willing to pay for it.
• You already use Omni Group products and prefer that ecosystem.

For these users, OmniPlan's depth is the point. The value comes from advanced project control, not from the fastest everyday planning surface. That is a real need, but it is not the default need for many people searching for an OmniPlan alternative.

When QuickPlanX Is the Best Choice

Choose QuickPlanX if:

• You want a professional Gantt planning app that feels fast on Mac, iPad, and iPhone.
• You personally build and maintain the schedule.
• You need hierarchy, dates, dependencies, milestones, progress, critical path, resources, and reports for real scheduling work.
• You want fast input from text, spreadsheets, mind maps, or AI-generated outlines.
• You value native Apple interactions, keyboard shortcuts, touch workflows, and a lower-friction interface.
• You care about a clean, beautiful planning workspace that is comfortable to use for long periods.
• You need strong outputs for communication: PDF, image, CSV, charts, resource reports, milestone reports, and customizable text reports.
• You want practical customization across fields, views, task display, toolbar access, appearance, and text templates.
• You prefer a dramatically lower annual cost.
• You want CloudKit-based continuity across your own Apple devices.

QuickPlanX is for users who want the plan to stay close to the work. It is powerful enough for real scheduling, fast enough for daily updates, beautiful enough to enjoy using, and focused enough that maintaining the plan does not become a separate administrative project.

The Honest Summary

OmniPlan is a strong product when complex project control is the job. It has deeper resource management, stronger advanced analysis, broader Microsoft Project file support, collaboration features, and a long professional history.

QuickPlanX is the best fit when the goal is everyday project planning excellence: build the schedule quickly, edit it naturally, customize the workspace, produce polished outputs, keep everything synced across Apple devices, and avoid paying for a heavyweight project-control system you may rarely use.

The decision is not about which app has the longest feature list. It is about which workflow you actually want to live in every week.

If your projects demand advanced controls, OmniPlan earns its place. If your work depends on keeping a real schedule current with less friction, QuickPlanX is the more compelling everyday choice - and for most Apple users evaluating an OmniPlan alternative, it is the product we would recommend first.

---

Ready to try QuickPlanX?

Related articles: Gantt Chart App for Apple Devices · Fast Project Planning · One Project Planning App for Mac, iPad, and iPhone · Microsoft Project XML Import and Export